Look, I'm all for access to information. With no hiding, no secrets, no tricks. Especially when it comes to financial organizations: banks, funds etc. Especially if these organizations accept, control, and reallocate investments. It should be noted, however, despite the seeming reliability, you have to remember that the emphasis is always on "seeming". Just like with Sarson...
Read more➤
Exam Fraud
The situation is the same, I am from Melbourne, but I chose to take the driving exam in Devonport, because I spent the summer there, so I learned to drive there. I went to A1 class, in figures I had to take 39 km / h to a certain line, twice I failed and the exam was not passed. With the motorcycle in question, it was not physically possible to pick up at that speed, at that distance. Only after both unsuccessful occasions did the instructor tell me that I could make this figure with a bend to get to pick up 39 km / h (I was 37 km / h). The money of course was collected as a full exam. It would be understandable if he said after the first failure that I could make a figure with a bend. But then I wouldn't have to take the exam again, and NSW would have no extra income. Very uncomfortable on the part of the instructor. I took the next exam in the Melbourne department, where I saw on the speedometer that the speed was not 39 km / h, but the instructor took the figure. So what does all this mean in the end? One possibility is that the NSW acquires the examiners once, so that it is not too suspicious and does not incite hatred. Or alternatively, departments and instructors have different requirements.
Read more...
