Here are two Partners of Warner Lott Duritza & Lowe located in Wall New Jersey. They are Yvonne Lowe CPA and Doug Duritza CPA. The Firm is now going by the Name Warner Duritza Lowe & Glassheim. Warner Lott Duritza & Lowe is being sued for Fraud, Malpractice and more. This Firm is also being sued for harassing and or bullying a woman! So all you ladies out there, sharing is caring. This may prevent future harassment and or Fraud! Share this if you have ever been scammed, harassed or ripped off! It also very important that this firm has also shared client personal information with other individuals. This is not only unethical but it is also disturbing. I would not trust Warner Duritza Lowe & Glassheim or Warner Lott Duritza & Lowe with a Social Security Number or privileged information. Yvonne Lowe and Doug Duritza, were Partners of Warner Lott Duritza & Lowe while these illegal activities were occurring. Below is testimony, sworn testimony by a former Warner Lott Duritza & Lowe Accountant. See sworn testimony below. Did you ever observe any conduct that 15 while perhaps not in violation of the ethical 16 guidelines made you feel uncomfortable? 17: MR. O'CONNOR: Objection to form. You 18, may answer. Yeah. Explain what you mean by that, please. I know in the end they were billing me out at a partner rate when I was not a partner. Q. And that was in what time frame, though? A. Probably the last two years I was there. Q '14 to '16, roughly? Yeah. And what was the partner rate at that time? A. I believe it was 275 an hour. Q. And what was the non-partner rate let me rephrase that. What was your correct billing rate as a non-partner. MR. O'CONNOR: Objection to form. You 12 may answer. 13 A. I don't know because I was always stuck 14 on the fact that they were billing me out at 275 an 15 hour. 16 1 7 ! should have been? 18 Q. And what did you think the correct rate MR. O'CONNOR: Objection to form. You 19 may answer. 20 A. 200, 185, 200. 21 Q. Was that the range for other 22 non-partners at the time? 23 A. I was only concerned with what they 24 were billing me out. I really didn't look at what 25 anyone else was being billing at. Veritext Legal Solutions [protected]-4040 Page 42 Q. Well, I'm trying to understand what the non-partner professional rate was at that time. So whether that's rates that firm used for other non-partners or for you with certain clients if you were billed out as a non-partner? I'm trying to understand the rate structure in a clumsy way. A. 185 sticks out in my head. I would say around 185 would be the range. Q. And that's true from 2000 -- well, let me ask you: During what time frame were you billed out as a partner at 275 when you think the correct rate would have been the non-partner rate of 185? A. Definitely my last year there. Q. 2016? A. Yes, absolutely. Q. How about before that? A. I don't know for sure. I know it was definitely being done in 2016. Q. We can look at the bills to find out. A. Okay. There you go. Share this if you live anywhere is South Jersey. This may protect others from being taken advantage of by Warner Lott Duritza & Lowe. Send us a message if you did business with this Accounting Firm, you may be able to recover some money. Warner Lott Duritza & Lowe is being sued for Malpractice, Harassing a woman, Consumer Fraud and more.