Claimbo.com is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with Good Housekeeping , or any of its subsidiaries or its affiliates. The use in this website and/or in related promotional print or video material of trademarked names and images is strictly for editorial and descriptive purposes.
Dear Customer Service, My name is Mary O’Sullivan and my GH account number is 229215****. I received a recent bill for $15.97 to renew my subscription. I was offered a discounted rate of $6.00 to renew in a previous mailing. What happened to this rate? I will pay $6.00 but absolutely not $15.97. Please resolve this problem...
Read more ➤
I purchased a Good Housekeeping candle. It is poor quality. It will not stay lit or burn correctly. I am disappointed in your product. I will not purchase your candles in the future,
They dont have qualified workers , no license for plumbing , they do plumbing work not to code , poor caulking , dont level shower pans , project manager argues they follow correct procedures , the installers do not , have pictures to show poor workmanship , now trying to have basement shower redone due to installing...
Read more ➤
I subscribed but and they GH have all my bank details never been in touch no confirmation not good i want to cancel this subscription, i will buy it in the shop and hopefully you will leave me alone User’s recommendation: do not join once you do they are not interested in you they just want your...
Read more ➤
Non-working number! ZxzxxxxzzzzzzxxxxzxxxxxxxzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzzzzzzzzzzxxxxzxxxzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz User’s recommendation: Do not use.
Uniform
Hello! I see the controller and the so-called security guard boarding the public transport. I can't define him as a security guard, because a person has put on pants and a jacket that is uniforms, but the hat is put on like a clown with a cap on the back and the hat does not match the uniforms. I very much doubt that sports hats are designed for shape. My immediate question is, is the so-called security guard at all entitled to object? The guard is not at work because he does not follow the regulations for wearing the uniform, so it is an ordinary person who does not perform his / her day-to-day duties. I mean for the koblenz security company vagag to train security guards according to the specifics of the job. I do not consider such a person to be a security guard on duty.
Read more...