Complaints & Reviews — Fabletics

The Godfather IV

Good evening! There was a need to increase the capacity of the apartment by creating a 1-phase system instead of 3-phase. Everything went slowly but well until I was sent a "Connection Agreement" from AS, so square discriminatory. The amount, it must be said, astronomical. 3-4 years ago the same thing was done 5 to 20x cheaper! As a result of business correspondence, please "clarify", "explain", etc. As a buyer of these services, I was, of course, interested in why I am required to pay 100% in advance (including a whole strip of penalties in the contract if paid in installments), as The answer to me is that it consists of such and such costs. God with the costs of the department, which are not for the average mind and make up about half of the amount. The other half, I see, is made up of a selection of construction companies (which Yes, I am in a hurry with all sorts of 15 and 30 calendar days, after which it is sent somewhere further away, but in the contract the term of work execution is 150 days!I did not receive an answer to the question why it could be changed to a shorter term in that agreement. They are not in a hurry with the answers themselves, 3-4 weeks... It was said that this is their standard contract and no changes are planned in it. In a telephone conversation, a girl from the Distribution Networks explained to me that "they are writing like this", that in reality it is happening faster... As I said, the greatest interest is caused by the documentation of "selection of construction companies", which they think (the dog knows what he ate!) do not deserve and even found some article of the "Commercial Law" for justification. Now a few quotes:they write "that in reality it happens faster... As I said, the greatest interest is caused by the documentation of" selection of construction companies ", which, in their opinion (the dog knows what he has eaten!) I do not deserve and even found an article in the" Commercial Law "justification. Now a few quotes:they write "that in reality it happens faster... As I said, the greatest interest is caused by the documentation of" selection of construction companies ", which, in their opinion (the dog knows what he has eaten!) I do not deserve and even found an article in the" Commercial Law "justification. Now a few quotes: Cit. If you want to offer a construction merchant of your choice for work, you can get information about them in the register of construction merchants: We draw your attention to the fact that the selected construction merchant must be granted the right to perform works in the territory of the region. In order to start re-selection of construction merchants, we invite you to submit a written application, in which we also ask you to indicate the reasons why you refuse the offer of the most economically advantageous construction merchant selected by the system operator. Please submit the application to the nearest customer service center or send it by post to the address: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX In addition, we draw your attention to the fact that when starting the selection of new construction companies, the offer of the construction company XXX "XXXX" selected in the previous selection will no longer be valid. Cit. the end. Here again I am intimidated by additional costs: Cit. We also draw your attention to the fact that re-organization of the selection of construction companies creates additional and unforeseen expenses for the system operator. Cit. the end. The most interesting here: Cit. In accordance with the provisions of Section 17 of the Law "Public Utilities Procurement Law" (entered into force on 4 September 2010) and Section 19 of the Law "Commercial Law" (entered into force on 1 January 2002), XXX XXXXXXXXX "The offer to increase the load on the apartment XXXXXXXXXX on XX-XX, XXXXXXX and the estimate is a trade secret, therefore its distribution is limited. Therefore, we cannot attach it to the reply letter or issue it to you personally. Cit. the end. In this case, the User pays 60%, the Supplier - 40%. But... my this 60% 100% prepayment is explained as follows (see, materials have to be bought, work is already nothing... ). Cit. Regarding the condition included in the Connection Agreement regarding the payment of the connection before the commencement of the construction works, we explain that the connection fee before the commencement of the construction works is requested in order to purchase the necessary materials before the commencement of the works. Cit. the end. Finally, they agree to "split" the connection fee, but do not agree with the "50% prepayment - work done - accepted, signed acceptance - transfer deed - I pay the remaining 50%" option. Final nonsense and dictation: 50%, after an unconditional time - another 50, but... only then will the work be done (receiving 100% payment). Cit. In case you are not able to pay the set connection fee immediately, we inform you about the possibility to divide it into two parts. To do this, you must submit an application stating your preferred payment schedule. After receiving the application and accepting the payment schedule from the system operator, a new connection agreement will be drawn up. However, in this case the meter will be installed and the voltage to the apartment will be connected only after full payment of the connection fee. In short, would be grateful for any ideas. Conceptually, I need it for electricity, but I'm not in the mood to buy a cat bag. Although I am a specialist, I have not worked in the industry for a long time, the scope of the cryptographic documentation in my hands is not very clear. If it is as I have imagined, then... the estimate definitely includes limousines and an orchestra for the transfer of the object, and if it is different - then everything is in order and the green light, I will be happy to pay. But... I do not understand what kind of horseradish is not due to me as a payer and whether those present cannot tell in front of any normative act to refer to for reference. And perhaps the Distribution Network Officer is simply misinterpreting that article? Okay, "we can't issue," a look? And in general.. how, in two words, to achieve more control on the part of the User? Thanks!