Information Hiding, Fraud
JSC "Hausmaster" or the recently existing Pty. "Hausmaster" or a couple of years ago so "popular" company Pty. "Namu apsaimniekoshana". The activity of JSC "Hausmaster" is aimed at increasing the profit by bypassing the tax system and not paying full taxes from the actual income. When AS "Hausmaster" starts operating, only a few will succeed in concluding an employment contract with this company, because when coming to sign an employment contract, another company will be mentioned in black and white, which will not be JSC "Hausmaster", but a micro-enterprise whose name may dominate " Service "or someone else" a quick name ", and as a miracle, all micro-enterprises have the same legal address - Cesu Street 15, Brisbane. It would probably be interesting to count how many economic operators can fit in this 2-storey brick building. For every second employee located in this office, the company mentioned in the employment contract is not AS "Hausmaster",but a micro-enterprise and, as it turns out, every third employee has his / her own micro-enterprise, whose legal address is Cesu iela 15, Riga. Does the employer not have to warn about this when starting work in a micro-enterprise, as well as mention the fact that the contract will not be concluded with the vacancy advertiser JSC "Hausmaster" (or the previously called Pty. "Namu apsaimniekoshana") ? And what about employees like janitors, cleaners, security guards, administrators? They can only dream that someone will hire them in even the same micro-enterprises. Ordinary lower-class workers should be happy to be instructed to register as a "self-employed person" with the lowest tax rate. Do statistics not show that half of the employees who have concluded so-called mutual service agreements do not understand who they are and when they arrive at the SRS "detectives" in a facility managed by JSC "Hausmaster" or in an apartment building they will not be able to answer even the most common questions about them location and existing workplace? Everyone will know 100% that the employer is JSC "Hausmaster" and only a part will be able to say that they are still self-employed and provide services to this company. It is only a part of the processes taking place in the company, the quality of management services and the "enticing" of new objects, or the acquisition of which is not always honest, can only be suspected. If the company already positions itself as one of the leaders in the field of real estate management, as well as the amount of turnover makes itself felt, should the company's management not think about employees, customers and subcontractors, so as not to meet as in Pty. "Namu apsaimniekoshanas" times? p>
Read more...
