1 Jan, 2018 → by ClaimboUser792299
secondary driver registered without the id holder’ consent
3
I came to a shocking conclusion that Mrs. (*#%#) ID nr: 680###0022087 is registered as a secondary driver to a Dodge Viper which she, nor her sons or soon to be wedded husband owns. I am here to remind the fact that this is outrageous and will proceed to court due to the fact that Mrs. (*#%#) ID nr: 680###0022087 without her consent was fraudulently assigned to be a secondary driver on a vehicle she does not even own or knew existed. When Mrs. (*#%#) requested the information she was declined of her rights as the ID holder and Registered Human to that ID by Outsurance although she is the "fraudulently" registered secondary driver. Outsurance indicated that they need to acquire consent from the Main account holder "Unknown" before they can allow Mrs. (*#%#) ID nr: 680###0022087 any information. So in regards with the South African (POPI) Protection of Personal Information act. Outsurance has Fraudulently accepted unconfirmed information from a stranger who happens to know Mrs (*#%#) ID nr: 680###0022087. I am delivering the complaint due to the nature of possible victimization if there is a crime committed or to be committed with the fraudulently registered Dodge Viper Information unknown non disclosed from Outsurance that Mrs. (*#%#) ID nr: 680###0022087 has been registered without her consent to the Dodge Viper. If any information is required due to the nature of the sensitive case I with held all information related to my client please contact me on: [protected].