Claimbo.com is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with First Union Lending , or any of its subsidiaries or its affiliates. The use in this website and/or in related promotional print or video material of trademarked names and images is strictly for editorial and descriptive purposes.
This company is trash. They use personal cell phone spamming tactics and lie about everything. They are not direct lenders. They are not a fintech company. They are bottom of the barrel snake oil salesmen. They are only “fintech” when it comes to hiding behind fake companies when they are spamming. These are temporary websites that come...
Read more➤
Great company full of people who care and take time to really help.
This is not a rant, it’s a rave. First Union Lending has been a pleasure to work with. I’ve had a ton of business loans as I try to grow my company and most were merchant cash advances. First Union Lending not only gave me the best merchant cash advance I’ve ever seen with a 24 month...
Read more➤
AVOID AVOID AVOID First Union Lending. They are very misleading in their marketing and they broker loans to actual lenders which cost you more. First I will address their misleading website and claims. They state they are a lender and even on their website and email signatures show a logo that states First Union Lending – Licensed...
Read more➤
I was illegally called by First Union Lending, LLC from Florida. 47 USC section 501 states that it is a federal crime to violate 47 USC 227(b)(1)(A) because it is “unlawful” to call a cellular phone on the DNC to sell whatever you are selling. Dennis Arroyo (aka dennis cage) did exactly that. Telemarketing to cell phones...
Read more➤
Center Director's Response to Complaints, Comments
I am the head of this center. I read all the comments. They made me disappointed. Joy and reflection. Disappointment. Several people have written a harsh reprimand to our center, in the creation of which a large number of employees have put and put the best they have. This has very disturbed and depressed us. And the reason is so simple - the reception work; G. Initially, both registrars were hired, there were technical problems with the phone, which were not observed and rectified in time. Here are the consequences! For the. There are no complaints about the work of doctors. That is the most important thing. In addition, in the more than 16 years since the center operated, this is the first complaint. I am glad that they are only about the shortcomings of work organization, which can be easily remedied. Reflections. The reception needs to be improved. The main thing is already done. There is a need to introduce an operational evaluation of the quality of the centre's work, as is the case in several Melbourne institutions (eg the patient gives his / her evaluation in a 5-point system, makes suggestions. ) There must be feedback. Thanks to the commenters. It's just a pity you didn't tell me all this orally. Sincerely, Allergist, dr. Med. V. Lozovskis
Read more...