Telstra's illegal actions
Telstra's illegal actions on October 14, 2010 The media generally avoids disclosing such information, so it is desperate. cry for individuals and legal entities - never choose Telstra as your telecommunications operator, because this company will steal money from you and try to recover it, if you even publicly prove this fact of fraud. The situation is similar to many subscribers receiving high-cost SMS, which was also found in the case of my wife Ritma Tirumniece several months later, because initially, with full confidence in our operator, we blamed both ourselves and our children for what happened. When all the options were exhausted, we turned to Telstra for explanations, where the biggest absurdity started. It turns out that my wife, without knowing it, had entered into a subscription agreement with a third party Ericsson IPX for the provision of the Radar service. Telstra, not complying with the requirements of the law, refused to provide the address of this company both orally and in writing, as a result of which we found out that this company is engaged in unlicensed business in Australia, therefore it only has a telephone number. When requesting information from the Consumer Protection Center, it turned outthat Telstra has openly lied about Ericsson IPX, and the real "service" providers are Vivazz Mobile, a company based in the Netherlands. On 19 August this year, the Zemgale Court District Prosecutor's Office initiated criminal proceedings due to fraud in electronic data transmission media. Initially, Telstra tried to prove that if Tirumniece herself did not order a text message subscription on December 15 last year, then it was done by someone else who might have access to her phone, say children. Taking into account that the subscription was allegedly ordered around 17-00 on the specified date, we repeatedly contacted the operator and indicated that she could not be physically at home during this time, because as the deputy director of Devonport Spidola Gymnasium, she is at work until at least 18 -00 - 19-00 every working day. We insisted that Telstra provide a written confirmation of the IP address from which the order was placed. Seeing that the children's version won't go through,they provided the IP address of the gymnasium's administrative network, which also proved to be the operator's biggest mistake, as only the principal and her deputies had access to this network. Gradually, Telstra withdrew from its requirements, initially canceling 21 AUD out of a total of 48 AUD, indicating in writing that Ericsson had illegally provided its services to the IPX subscriber from December 15, 2009 to February 8, 2010. On October 13 of this year, around 10:00, my wife Ritma Tirumniece, once again contacting the seventh operator Larisa, wanted to find out how the provision of this service could become legal starting from February 8, but the operator, after consulting with her management, announced, that the fee is also canceled for the rest of the period, because, however, the service was generally illegal. Thus, Telstra admits that their subscriber has been deceived by clearly demonstrating his interest in the fraud process, unlawfully failing to disclose the statutory information about the service provider, as well as the operator himself has violated the standard contract by allowing a fourth party Vivazz Mobile to intervene. The above does not prevent Telstra from still maintaining the claim for a contractual penalty, which is still being sought through Creditreform, despite the fact that the real breach of contract is the operator itself. Prepared by: Aivars Tirumnieks mob. t 26010865; Email: [hide] @inbox.org
Read more...
