Complaints & Reviews — Car Vision

Poor service, thoughtful reasons for refusing compensation

Compensation case no. 62755. I sent a second claim to review the case here. G. October 4, because new circumstances had arisen. Ergo promises to review all claims and provide answers to the claim no later than 14 kal. D. Time. I patiently waited 32! How to. Days. When I reminded you several times in writing and by calling on November 4, I received the answer that a roofing act and a photo fixation had to be done for the roofers! Therefore, the operator of the roof must work instead of an ergo expert! On the other hand, I doubt if these pictures would be good enough if you could and how can you prove that they are right from the roof of my apartment building?There are many such houses. 13. During the June storm, the glazed ball ceiling was leaked, and the ergo expert himself was not convinced of the real reason for the leak when climbing on the roof, but was satisfied with the operator's assumption. It turned out that when the attention of the attention of the fact that otherwise there was no orange warning storm, and arelia rain, no flooding. Sorry, yes, and it did not cause any doubt ergo specialists. It turns out that the storm blew rain ditches on the ventilation openings above the bullet and in "normal" rain conditions this does not happen. I am surprised by the ergo action, writing down the forms, not admitting my guilt, not observing the deadlines, not fulfilling the duties of my expert. Advice to other ergo clients - - do not give up, if you are not satisfied with ergo decisions, write to ptac, fktk, American insurers' association at the same time, which i would do too, don't give up! PS I do not attach files, all correspondence is in ergo system, case no. 62755.