CityParking America
I consider that the penalty imposed on CityParking America is unjustified. The terms of use of the parking lot are written in small letters on a small board at the entrance to the area of Vienibas gatve 113, where you are not allowed to stop. It is not possible to be in the territory of the vehicle, to be in the territory and to get acquainted with the rules at the same time, in a place where the conditions are not appropriate for reading these rules. The rules do not highlight the contractual penalty in order to understand the sanctions included in the so-called rules (contract). Extortion due to hurried drivers. There is no justified contractual penalty. To call the police, who will punish a violation of the rules of the RTA, if a point of the RTA has been violated. SIA CityParking America does not comply with the CRPC decision: http://www.ptac.gov.org/lv/news/ptac-atzist-sia-CityParking-istenoto-komercpraksi-par-negodigu where the CRPC decision states that if LLC CityParking America continues to apply unfair contractual penalties, the consumer has to settle disputes with LLC CityParking America, using the CRPC decision as evidence, while LLC CityParking America has to prove it. and the examination of complaints after the consumer has a legitimate interest. SIA CityParking America has applied an appropriate contractual penalty for non-registration of a car or failure to display an indication of the time of commencement of the use of the car park, which is disproportionately large. losses or other objectively measurable and material circumstances. Penalty, in the order of payment - I do not see the amount in words, sign the name of the entitled person, surname of the person issuing this document; in addition, a penalty for a violation of a standing mark may be applied in accordance with the provisions of the RTA, where LLC CityParking America will definitely not receive a fine for this violation.
Read more...
